The Taurus Curve is the latest new pistol from our Brazilian friends. Taurus International is now making a pistol that is designed to be carried for self-defense, but could be one of the more difficult designs to shoot.
What makes this pistol different from other designs is that the polymer frame is curved – hence the name. In theory, this could make the gun more comfortable to carry though I have my reservations (more on that in a moment.)
The Curve is chambered for the .380 ACP cartridge and it holds six rounds in the magazine. The barrel is 2.5″ long and has a slant cut at the muzzle.
The gun has no traditional sights. There is a cross-hair drawn on the back of the slide that might give a shooter some crude visual reference to where the bullets might go. It seems the cross-hair even has its own trademarked name: the Bore Axis Sighting System. Pretty fancy for a pair of intersecting lines.
It appears that the only reliable way to aim the gun is through an internal laser provided by LaserLyte. The integrated laser module also includes a pair of LED white lights for illumination. I could not find any specific information on how bright those lights are supposed to be.
Taurus ships the curve with a removable metal clip so the gun can be carried without a holster. While this may be the easiest way to conceal the gun, I still recommend a holster for a multitude of reasons, not the least of which is to cover the trigger. Interestingly, Taurus includes a Kydex trigger cover that can be snapped into place to prevent a negligent discharge. However, the cover must be pulled off manually after drawing the gun.
Personally, I think the gun looks like a Kimber Pepper Blaster, but it could just be me.
Taurus Curve Specifications
Caliber | .380 ACP |
Magazine Capacity | 6 |
Barrel Length | 2.5″ |
Overall Length | 5.18″ |
Width | 1.18″ |
Weight | 10.2 oz |
Sights | no traditional; painted cross hair on rear of slide; integral laser |
Slide | carbon steel |
Frame | polymer |
Trigger | DAO |
These guns will be made in the United States at the company’s Miami facility. The MSRP is set at $392.
Potential Problems
There are a slew of potential problems with this pistol. I do not want to be a Debbie Downer on this gun, but I definitely see a number of issues that have to be considered by anyone considering this pistol for anything more than a curio.
First, the curved nature of the pistol limits how the gun can be comfortably carried. If carried inside-the-waistband on the right side of the body, the gun might print a little less, and it could be slightly more comfortable than a traditional pistol. However, it would seem that this:
- gun would print more – not less- if carried on the left side of the body (exception: cross draw), and
- it might print more, or just be less comfortable, if carried in an appendix position since this area of the body tends to be flatter, not rounded like the hip.
A second problem with the design is the curved nature of the frame will likely make the gun harder to grip for shooting.
The third and fourth potential problems are with the magazine design. The magazines are necessarily inserted on an angle, likely making mag changes more difficult due to a lack of instinctive motion. If the magazines are curved, then you have an additional problem with how to carry them. (Update – the magazines are not curved. It looks like the curved mags will go with the curved gun patent mentioned below.)
Additionally, the magazine appears to be removed by pinching the base of it and stripping it from the mag well. It doesn’t appear that this would be a fast way to swap mags. This same style of magazine was used on the SW380 pistol from Smith & Wesson. Don’t remember that pistol? There’s a reason for that…
Something that I thought was telling was an observation from Guns & Ammo that reviewed the pistol prior to its announcement:
With a bit of practice, getting hits on torso target at distances across an average-sized room was no problem in G&A’s initial testing.
Considering it took practice to get shots on a torso target at a distance of 8-12′, I would say that accuracy is not this gun’s strong point.
Outside the Box Thinking
Taurus was thinking enough outside of the box to file and receive a patent on this design. The “Body Contour Handgun” patent most closely resembles this firearm.
However, the company also filed a “Curved Handgun” patent application. The curved handgun appears to be mated with the curved magazine application referenced above. Based on the Curved Handgun application, it appears Taurus is looking at a developing a gun curved to the buttocks and carried in a back pocket. Insert crude joke here.
Taurus is one of those companies that I like, though I’m not sure that I should. Based on my experiences with the warranty department when reviewing the 709 SLIM and the general unreliability of the 740 SLIM, I would be hesitant to buy any new Taurus pistol.
However, I do like that Taurus is willing to think out of the box and try new things. For example, while I personally have no interest in owning one of the company’s Judge revolvers, I am pretty much astounded at how they developed a brand new niche in the market that has been emulated by Smith & Wesson. Even Charter Arms developed a prototype gun called the Big Dawg that did essentially the same thing.
Of course, the company has had its share of failures. The recently released View has not been getting rave reviews, and the 28-gauge version of the Taurus revolver was DOA due to US laws.
Bottom Line
While I applaud Taurus for creative thinking, I just don’t see that this gun will fill a niche in the serious self-defense market. Yes, the company may sell a lot of them – or not – but sales numbers are not an accurate predictor of reliability or usefulness in a deadly force encounter.
Last Update: October 17, 2022
46 replies on “Taurus Curve – Another Oddball Pistol”
Unbelievably stupid. I guess when the company is in the crapper, you start selling poo.
Seriously? It’s a gun the size of an LCP and you’re worried about speed reloads?
As for it not being very good for lefties, you can’t make everyone happy. At least they’re trying different stuff and seeing what works.
Hi Ben,
Thanks for taking the time to stop by and leave a comment.
Frankly, I am not worried about “speed reloads” with this gun because I would never trust my life or those I care about to this tool. It appears to be a completely inferior product for self-defense.
However, I recognize that others might consider this weapon for personal protection. It is, after all, cheap and likely to be supported by a strong marketing campaign.
It is merely my goal to offer people things to think about when considering this firearm. Since the gun’s intended purpose is a grave one, my considerations on the pistol are from that perspective. You may note that I did not talk about its usefulness for other things such as plinking, hunting or competition.
I agree with you in that Taurus is “trying different stuff.” You’ll see me say much the same thing in this article under the heading of “outside the box thinking.”
Best,
Richard
Mea culpa. I did completely skip over that paragraph. (As a fellow blogger I find it interesting why I did. I remember skimming and reading the titles of the various outbound links and didn’t see any in that paragraph, so I skipped it. Hmmm.) I’d already made up my mind to leave a huffy comment, so I just needed to complete the rest of the article before I felt entitled to.
That said, I still think criticizing small holdout guns like this for being awkward to reload is a stretch. Fishing the mag out of your pocket, and inserting it in the tiny handle of the gun, curve grip or no curved grip, is always gonna be slow. Nobody worries about that with the LCP.
Hi Ben,
No worries. Like I said, I am merely pointing out potential drawbacks with the gun. Many people may not care about reloading a tiny pistol. Others might – it is just a potential concern for anyone buying the gun.
FWIW – I don’t care for the LCP either. 😉 If I am going small, I’d much rather have a tiny Kahr, G42 or a J-frame. With the slightly larger guns, I feel I get a significantly increased ability to put rounds on target. The LCP I tested was relatively difficult to shoot accurately and had the unfortunate tendency to malfunction.
Best,
Richard
+Richard Johnson – I think you are promoting yourself as too much of an expert without even giving the item a tryout. That makes your ‘opinions’ speculative and inacurrate, since you don’t have any FACTS about the item your writing about except what you have ‘read’ by others and the manufacturer – then you give your own opinion which in ‘my opinion’ is useless since we all have access to the same info you are writing about.
As for the part you mentioned about not recommending it for self-defense? You have to have tried it before you can actually make that claim! How can you “recommend or not recommend” anything you have not tried??
Yes, the gun sucks for a Lefty – so this is simple: Lefties, stay out of it until there’s one that you can try. All of this opinionated jargon is depressing people who really want to know facts. You opinions only come AFTER you have created your own facts, not re-representing them from a 3rd party perspective.
Now, you also mentioned about this item being inferior for self defense as a ‘concealed weapon’, BUT it’s STEALTH! So there, you have even managed to disqualify it for something that it does better than most other weapons which lack in regards to it being ‘well’ concealed. Do you now see the error in your ways? You are giving a BIASED OPINION because YOU don’t like it. That’s not fair assessment even for a guy with your so-called experience in self defense weaponry use. Please cut the bull, and make your assessments based on your own facts and then your opinion will have warranted an opinion worthy of respect.
I am just a few hours from completing a bid on this item, I am very excited about it even though I am a lefty but acquired my CHL by using my right hand. I am having it because of it’s stealth-nature and believe it will be better than not having any weapon in situations where I need protection but tired of the usual guns I already carry but am just tired of thinking my life is on the line all of the time and this item is very practical in situations where my odds of having any altercations are minimal.
In other words, I would not carry this item on a dark night in an area I am not familiar with, but in the broad daylight and in going to public areas, I will feel safe-enough since altercations in these scenarios are very rare 😉
Thanks for taking the time to post. Of course my opinions are biased – just like yours are. My biases are based on my experiences that include using firearms to save my life and others. So, I have a bit of a no-BS bias when it comes to life saving tools. As I stated, I like Taurus thinking out of the box when developing this firearm, but thinking different does not mean the gun will be a good choice for saving someone’s life.
Of course, watching a pair of gun dealers break a Curve on day 1 of the SHOT Show by simply pulling the slide back didn’t inspire any confidence in the design.
Also, problems with the Taurus 709 SLIM (https://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/gun-reviews/taurus-709-slim/) and the 740 SLIM (https://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/gun-reviews/taurus-740-slim/) suggested to me that the poor quality reputation Taurus seems to have is accurate.
At the end of the day, we all have to make decisions on what value we place on our lives and what risks we are willing to take to protect it. It sounds like we have both made our calculations, and we both have to live with those decisions.
Thanks again for reading and for taking the time to post.
I bought a Taurus curve I have no issues with it, I even bought a high point 45acp also had no issues with it, people who dont know anything about guns or their manufacturers should not be making any statements.
Hi Tony,
Thanks for taking the time to share your experiences with the Taurus Curve and Hi-Point pistols. I’m happy to hear about your positive experiences with the two weapons.
I am unsure if your comments about someone not being allowed to offer their opinions about a subject are directed toward me. If they are, I’m afraid you appear to be misinformed about my experience with firearms and manufacturers.
Without going into nauseating detail, I’ve carried firearms and used them for the defense of myself and others for more than 20 years. During that time, I’ve shot scores (hundreds?) of different firearms including those in the early development stages. I have spent time at multiple different firearms companies and observed the R&D and manufacturing processes. I’ve interviewed engineers and CEOs from many different companies including Taurus.
While we may disagree on the suitability of different firearms for various purposes, to make a blanket statement that I should not offer an opinion on them is ludicrous on its face and certainly not in line with the principles of free expression.
I invite you to stick around and keep reading. While we may not agree on a lot of things, I will still try to provide you with the best information possible without clogging up your experience with a bunch of advertisements, pop-ups and auto-playing videos.
Best,
-Richard
What the heck you do if you’re left handed !
Talk about all the wrong curves……
Looks like some design engineer was up too late one night ?
I’ll stick to my judge
Supposedly they are trailing this one with a left handed model.
Not that i am overly interested in this handgun but do you have any actual working first hand knowledge of it? The impression I got from your write up was you are giving an opinion on a handgun you have never actually held or fired.
Hi Richard,
Thanks for taking the time to read the article and respond.
You are correct – this is not a review of the gun. The guns are not on the market, and the only ones that have been fired are a few hand-built models. (Sort of like the R-51 pistols shown to some friendly media last year prior to the SHOT Show.)
This is an informational article with my opinions based on the information released by Taurus and my years of experience of carrying firearms into harm’s way. My experiences are unique, and are not intended to do anything more than give others things to consider before dropping cash on this pistol.
Best,
Richard
Excellent question. And I didn’t see any personal attack by SD3, BTW, Mr. Johnson. He makes a good point, and left handers such as myself or people who don’t like it can take it or leave it, as we see fit. There ARE other choices. That said, the guy in the YouTube video I saw shooting it didn’t appear to be having any problems, although I will stipulate that it’s probably a hand built prototype. The idea interests me and I will give it a look when it’s available. THEN I will make the decision as to whether or not it’s for me.
well let me tell you about this gun. When I saw it I had to have it. At first it looked cheap till I held it. It was solid. I had it for about a year and a half before I shot it. My wife doesn’t want guns in the hose but I got it anyway and hid it. The day I went to the range and shot it. WOW, what a piece! this thing shoots fast, accurate. Taurus really did a good job ob this. I had no problems with it, no double feeds, jams or anything, I was just firing away. It is a bit awkward to shoot a un with no sights but you have these markers on the back that make up for it so, just use good judgement and sight alignment/picture and should be no problem hitting your target. AS far a carrying concealed, haven’t done it yet but Im sure it can be done very easily. I would get a holster for it to carry it to be more comfortable. I don’t know what other s are saying about this gun but it think its awesome. They probably didn’t even shot it or held it in their hand, its a perfect little piece.
Hi Tony,
Thanks for taking the time to read this article and offering your experiences.
Since the time I wrote about this gun announcement, I have shot the Curve. In fact, I shot the updated Curve with the improved trigger. My experience with the gun appears to be different than yours. I found the gun to be uncomfortable to shoot with a very poor trigger. The lack of sights made for both imprecise and inaccurate shooting. The use of a red laser unfortunately made its use in daylight conditions useless.
Reliability issues aside, I found the Taurus Spectrum to be a much better shooting pistol.
I’m glad your pistol works for you. No gun will appeal to all people, and we clearly have differing views on this one. I sincerely hope you take a training class or two with it to really learn its strong and weak points so you will be prepared to use it should circumstances to do so ever be forced on you.
Thanks again for reading.
-Richard